Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00047
Original file (PD 2014 00047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-00047
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140729
SEPARATION DATE: 20070412


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (19D10/Cavalry Scout) medically separated for narcolepsy. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. The CI was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The narcolepsy condition characterized as “not meeting retention standards” and was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded four other conditions (borderline hypertension, allergic rhinitis, idiopathic hive syndrome and attention deficit hyperactive disorder). The informal PEB adjudicated “narcolepsy” as unfitting, rated 10%. The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I was discharged prior to my sleep apnea and narcolepsy could be fully developed. Immediately after my discharge the VA determined I need a C-PAP machine ultimately determining my 50% disability.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting narcolepsy condition is addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20070129
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Narcolepsy 8108 10% Narcolepsy 8108 0% 20070623
No Other Items in Scope
 Other x 6 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80228 ( most proximate to date of separation )
Rating for narcolepsy increased to 10% effective 20070413 by VARD 20080708.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Narcolepsy Condition. The CI underwent evaluation for complaint of excessive daytime drowsiness with nighttime sleep study and daytime multiple sleep latency testing in August 2006. The nighttime sleep study demonstrated an apnea/hypopnea index of 4.8 events per hour indicating mild sleep apnea (the result was at the threshold for diagnosis of sleep apnea with a normal up to 5). The daytime multiple sleep latency test demonstrated onset of sleep of 4.9 minutes (normal 10 minutes or more) suggestive of narcolepsy. He was diagnosed with mild obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy uncomplicated by cataplexy (drop attacks) and started on medication (Provigil) for excessive daytime drowsiness. At the time of a clinic appointment, dated 26 September 2006, the CI reported he had not had problems with daytime sleepiness since starting the Provigil. A neurology consult for the MEB, dated 24 October 2006, noted “improvement of most of the symptoms” with the medication. An evaluation on 14 November 2006, similarly noted significant improvement.

The VA compensation and pension (C&P) examination dated 23 June 2007, (2 months after separation) the CI reported easily falling asleep if not active, but never while driving or meeting. He indicated he was tolerating his medication well. A VA neurology clinic appointment on 30 July 2007, 3 months after separation, noted he was “doing much better” with the medication.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the narcolepsy 10% based on DoDI 1332.38 for mild impairment (coded 8108, narcolepsy). The VA initially rated the narcolepsy (8108) 0%, however subsequent rating decision dated 8 July 2008, increased the rating to 10% citing requirement for continuous medication. Narcolepsy is rated under VASRD diagnostic code 8108 which provides that narcolepsy is to be rated as for epilepsy petit mal, which is rated under the general rating formula for minor seizures. Following diagnosis, the CI’s narcolepsy was controlled with medication supporting a 10% rating. No episodes due to narcolepsy equivalent to a minor seizure were documented prior to separation to support consideration of a rating higher than 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the narcolepsy condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the narcolepsy condition and IAW VASRD §4.124a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.














The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121220, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150003761 (PD201400047)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02137

    Original file (PD-2013-02137.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20060412 The VA C&P clearly noted that the treated narcolepsy no longer had a significant effect on either his work or daily life. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00552

    Original file (PD2009-00552.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The medical basis for the separation was Central Nervous System Hypersomnolence. The CI was referred to the PEB, determined unfit for continued military service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. The initial 10% rating was based on lack of evidence of either at least two minor seizures in the last six months or a diagnosis of sleep apnea with persistent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00281

    Original file (PD2013 00281.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI had a P3 (for idiopathic hypersomnolence, U2 (chest pain), L1, H1, E1, S2 (major depressive disorder).A sleep study performed on 27 Mar 2003, the CI reported he would fall asleep in the middle of conversations, sleepiness, hypnagogic hallucinations on occasion, occasional cataplectic symptoms, no sleep paralysis and no depressive symptoms. Depressive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS): The Board considered the appropriateness of changes in mental health (MH) diagnoses, PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01495

    Original file (PD-2014-01495.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20091228 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01375

    Original file (PD 2012 01375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The narrative summary (NARSUM) dictated 10 months prior to separation acknowledged the result of the sleep study and it’s finding of narcolepsy and stated “No significant obstructive sleep apneas were identified,” and noted the CI no longer used CPAP. The VA rating decision specified use of the 6847 OSA criteria for their rating, and did not specify frequency of narcolepsy events. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00901

    Original file (PD2012 00901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although symptoms did improve with medication, a P3 profile due to “sleeping disorder” was recorded on 2 November 2002, limiting the CI to “no driving vehicles, handling ammunition, firing weapons or performing duties requiring concentration or alertness.” The commander’s performance statement letter, dated 14 March 2003,records that the limitation of duties for narcolepsy prohibits assignments in which “sudden incapacitation would be dangerous to self or others.” The narrative summary...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00955

    Original file (PD2011-00955.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    We feel that this warrants a review for a consideration to The Permanent Disabled Retired List.” He elaborates no specific contentions regarding rating or coding and mentions no additionally contended conditions. The Board however noted a neurology clinic record dated 21 May 2007 that indicated the CI was not using CPAP, that prescribed medication completely controlled the cataplexy, and that medication was also controlling his daytime sleepiness. At the time of the 26 March 2010 C&P...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00606

    Original file (PD2010-00606.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    after discharge for narcolepsy (20%) rating the following would be the correct code for condition. My VA rating for this condition is 50%. I would ask the board to please review all unfitting conditions that would have applied.” He additionally mentions his VA conditions and ratings per the rating chart below.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00120

    Original file (PD2012-00120.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was then medically separated with a 20% disability rating. A C&P examination for mental illness was performed on 21 August 2006, 2 months after separation, and the examiner noted a GAF of 70 to 80 with a diagnosis of mood disorder secondary to medical condition. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the mood disorders due to narcolepsy...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01556

    Original file (PD-2013-01556.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to Adjudication Date*) - Effective 19991115On TDRL - 19990820 CodeRating Condition CodeRatingExam ConditionTDRL Sep.Chronic LBP5299-529510%Chronic LBP with Degenerative Disc Disease529220%19991217523710%Narcolepsy810820%0%Narcolepsy with Cataplexy810820%19991217Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x8(Not in Scope) Combined: 30% → 10% Combined: 50% *Reflects VA rating exam proximate to TDRL placement (Final VA rating did not change at time of Separation) Chronic LBP Condition . The Board...